[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbi+LmLSuqLn5=K-KvSzLrYQs2H5mwSkOVi+5xTJoZBzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:56:49 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 net-next 3/9] pinctrl: ocelot: allow pinctrl-ocelot to
be loaded as a module
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 9:00 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 8:25 PM Colin Foster
> <colin.foster@...advantage.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 02:53:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:17 AM Colin Foster
> > > <colin.foster@...advantage.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > builtin_platform_driver(ocelot_pinctrl_driver);
> > >
> > > This contradicts the logic behind this change. Perhaps you need to
> > > move to module_platform_driver(). (Yes, I think functionally it won't
> > > be any changes if ->remove() is not needed, but for the sake of
> > > logical correctness...)
> >
> > I'll do this. Thanks.
> >
> > Process question: If I make this change is it typical to remove all
> > Reviewed-By tags? I assume "yes"
>
> I would not. This change is logical continuation and I truly believe
> every reviewer will agree on it.
I would have to think hard to remember a single review comment from Andy
where I didn't think "ah, yeah he's right", so definately keep mine.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists