netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: Don't do preempt check when migrate is disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:43:09 -0700
From:   Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
To:     Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        quentin@...valent.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: Don't do preempt check when migrate is disabled

Hi Yafang,

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 8:49 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:
>
> It doesn't need to do the preempt check when migrate is disabled
> after commit
> 74d862b682f5 ("sched: Make migrate_disable/enable() independent of RT").
>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
> ---

In my understanding, migrate_disable() doesn't imply
preempt_disable(), I think this is not safe. Am I missing something?

Hao