netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: lan966x: hardcode port count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 22:56:30 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: lan966x: hardcode port count

Am 2022-06-30 22:44, schrieb Horatiu Vultur:
> The 06/30/2022 16:02, Michael Walle wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know 
>> the content is safe
>> 
>> Don't rely on the device tree to count the number of physical port. 
>> Instead
>> introduce a new compatible string which the driver can use to select 
>> the
>> correct port count.
>> 
>> This also hardcodes the generic compatible string to 8. The rationale 
>> is
>> that this compatible string was just used for the LAN9668 for now and 
>> I'm
>> not even sure the current driver would support the LAN9662.
> 
> It works also on LAN9662, but I didn't have time to send patches for
> DTs. Then when I send patches for LAN9662, do I need to go in all dts
> files to change the compatible string for the 'switch' node?

I'd assume there is one lan9662.dtsi and yes, there should then be
   compatible = "microchip,lan9662-switch";
or
   compatible = "microchip,lan9662-switch", "microchip,lan966x-switch";
depending on the outcome of the question Krzysztof raised.

And of course adding the compatible string to the driver with a port
count of 4 (?). I can't find anything about the lan9662, and you've
mentioned it has 4 ports. Are there four external ports? I was
under the impression the last digit of the SoC name stands for the
number of ports.

-michael