[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04b47f81-77d6-9429-5b8f-fdf4fbbfb62d@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:22:25 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dec/tulip:fix repeated words in comments
On 6/29/22 11:54, Jilin Yuan wrote:
> Delete the redundant word 'this'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/xircom_cb.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/xircom_cb.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/xircom_cb.c
> index 8759f9f76b62..61825c9bd6be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/xircom_cb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/xircom_cb.c
> @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static void activate_receiver(struct xircom_private *card)
>
> /*
> deactivate_receiver disables the receiver on the card.
> -To achieve this this code disables the receiver first;
> +To achieve this code disables the receiver first;
No.
Instead it should be something like:
To achieve this, this code disables the receiver first; ...
but better look at the whole comment including the next line,
in which case it could become:
Disable the receiver first, then wait for it to become inactive.
...
> then it waits for the receiver to become inactive.
>
> must be called with the lock held and interrupts disabled.
> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static void activate_transmitter(struct xircom_private *card)
>
> /*
> deactivate_transmitter disables the transmitter on the card.
> -To achieve this this code disables the transmitter first;
> +To achieve this code disables the transmitter first;
> then it waits for the transmitter to become inactive.
same here...
>
> must be called with the lock held and interrupts disabled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists