netdev - [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5: delete dead code in mlx5_esw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:59:52 -0700
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5: delete dead code in mlx5_esw_unlock()

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

Smatch complains about this function:

    drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c:2000 mlx5_esw_unlock()
    warn: inconsistent returns '&esw->mode_lock'.

Before commit ec2fa47d7b98 ("net/mlx5: Lag, use lag lock") there
used to be a matching mlx5_esw_lock() function and the lock and
unlock functions were symmetric.  But now we take the lock
unconditionally and must unlock unconditionally as well.

As near as I can tell this is dead code and can just be deleted.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
index 719ef26d23c0..3e662e389be4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
@@ -1995,8 +1995,6 @@ int mlx5_esw_try_lock(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
  */
 void mlx5_esw_unlock(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
 {
-	if (!mlx5_esw_allowed(esw))
-		return;
 	up_write(&esw->mode_lock);
 }
 
-- 
2.36.1