[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2834855.e9J7NaK4W3@opensuse>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 17:36:42 +0200
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ixgbe: Use kmap_local_page in ixgbe_check_lbtest_frame()
On giovedì 30 giugno 2022 23:59:23 CEST Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:18 AM Fabio M. De Francesco
> <fmdefrancesco@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On giovedì 30 giugno 2022 18:09:18 CEST Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 8:25 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 5:17 PM Alexander Duyck
> > > > <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 3:10 AM Maciej Fijalkowski
> > > > > <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:58:36AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > The use of kmap() is being deprecated in favor of
> > kmap_local_page().
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > With kmap_local_page(), the mapping is per thread, CPU local
and
> > not
> > > > > > > globally visible. Furthermore, the mapping can be acquired
from
> > any context
> > > > > > > (including interrupts).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Therefore, use kmap_local_page() in
ixgbe_check_lbtest_frame()
> > because
> > > > > > > this mapping is per thread, CPU local, and not globally
visible.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to ask why kmap was there in the first place and not
plain
> > > > > > page_address() ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alex?
> > > > >
> > > > > The page_address function only works on architectures that have
> > access
> > > > > to all of physical memory via virtual memory addresses. The kmap
> > > > > function is meant to take care of highmem which will need to be
> > mapped
> > > > > before it can be accessed.
> > > > >
> > > > > For non-highmem pages kmap just calls the page_address function.
> > > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/
highmem-internal.h#L40
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sure, but drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c is
allocating
> > > > pages that are not highmem ?
> > > >
> > > > This kmap() does not seem needed.
> > >
> > > Good point. So odds are page_address is fine to use. Actually there
is
> > > a note to that effect in ixgbe_pull_tail.
> > >
> > > As such we could probably go through and update igb, and several of
> > > the other Intel drivers as well.
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > I don't know this code, however I know kmap*().
> >
> > I assumed that, if author used kmap(), there was possibility that the
page
> > came from highmem.
> >
> > In that case kmap_local_page() looks correct here.
> >
> > However, now I read that that page _cannot_ come from highmem.
Therefore,
> > page_address() would suffice.
> >
> > If you all want I can replace kmap() / kunmap() with a "plain"
> > page_address(). Please let me know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Fabio
>
> Replacing it with just page_address() should be fine. Back when I
> wrote the code I didn't realize that GFP_ATOMIC pages weren't
> allocated from highmem so I suspect I just used kmap since it was the
> way to cover all the bases.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Alex
>
OK, I'm about to prepare another patch with page_address() (obviously, this
should be discarded).
Last thing... Is that page allocated with dma_pool_alloc() at
ixgbe/ixgbe_fcoe.c:196? Somewhere else?
Thanks,
Fabio
P.S.: Can you say something about how pages are allocated in intel/e1000
and in intel/e1000e? I see that those drivers use kmap_atomic().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists