Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 20:41:00 +0200
From:   Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Scott Mayhew <smayhew@...hat.com>,
        Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC net] Should sk_page_frag() also look at the current GFP context?

I'm investigating a kernel oops that looks similar to
20eb4f29b602 ("net: fix sk_page_frag() recursion from memory reclaim")
and dacb5d8875cc ("tcp: fix page frag corruption on page fault").

This time the problem happens on an NFS client, while the previous bzs
respectively used NBD and CIFS. While NBD and CIFS clear __GFP_FS in
their socket's ->sk_allocation field (using GFP_NOIO or GFP_NOFS), NFS
leaves sk_allocation to its default value since commit a1231fda7e94
("SUNRPC: Set memalloc_nofs_save() on all rpciod/xprtiod jobs").

To recap the original problems, in commit 20eb4f29b602 and dacb5d8875cc,
memory reclaim happened while executing tcp_sendmsg_locked(). The code
path entered tcp_sendmsg_locked() recursively as pages to be reclaimed
were backed by files on the network. The problem was that both the
outer and the inner tcp_sendmsg_locked() calls used current->task_frag,
thus leaving it in an inconsistent state. The fix was to use the
socket's ->sk_frag instead for the file system socket, so that the
inner and outer calls wouln't step on each other's toes.

But now that NFS doesn't modify ->sk_allocation anymore, sk_page_frag()
sees sunrpc sockets as plain TCP ones and returns ->task_frag in the
inner tcp_sendmsg_locked() call.

Also it looks like the trend is to avoid GFS_NOFS and GFP_NOIO and use
memalloc_no{fs,io}_save() instead. So maybe other network file systems
will also stop setting ->sk_allocation in the future and we should
teach sk_page_frag() to look at the current GFP flags. Or should we
stick to ->sk_allocation and make NFS drop __GFP_FS again?

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
---
 include/net/sock.h | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 72ca97ccb460..b934c9851058 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>	/* struct sk_buff */
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -2503,14 +2504,17 @@ static inline void sk_stream_moderate_sndbuf(struct sock *sk)
  * socket operations and end up recursing into sk_page_frag()
  * while it's already in use: explicitly avoid task page_frag
  * usage if the caller is potentially doing any of them.
- * This assumes that page fault handlers use the GFP_NOFS flags.
+ * This assumes that page fault handlers use the GFP_NOFS flags
+ * or run under memalloc_nofs_save() protection.
  *
  * Return: a per task page_frag if context allows that,
  * otherwise a per socket one.
  */
 static inline struct page_frag *sk_page_frag(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	if ((sk->sk_allocation & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_MEMALLOC | __GFP_FS)) ==
+	gfp_t gfp_mask = current_gfp_context(sk->sk_allocation);
+
+	if ((gfp_mask & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_MEMALLOC | __GFP_FS)) ==
 	    (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_FS))
 		return &current->task_frag;
 
-- 
2.21.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists