Message-ID: <CAGETcx-fLAXnG+1S4MHJwg9t7O6jj6Mp+q25bh==C_Z1CLs-mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 00:02:22 -0700
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: (EXT) Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] PM: domains: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state()

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:02 PM Alexander Stein
<alexander.stein@...tq-group.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Saravana,
>
> Am Freitag, 1. Juli 2022, 02:37:14 CEST schrieb Saravana Kannan:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 5:08 AM Alexander Stein
> >
> > <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2022, 09:28:43 CEST schrieb Tony Lindgren:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> [700101 02:00]:
> > > > > Now that fw_devlink=on by default and fw_devlink supports
> > > > > "power-domains" property, the execution will never get to the point
> > > > > where driver_deferred_probe_check_state() is called before the
> > > > > supplier
> > > > > has probed successfully or before deferred probe timeout has expired.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, delete the call and replace it with -ENODEV.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like this causes omaps to not boot in Linux next. With this
> > > > simple-pm-bus fails to probe initially as the power-domain is not
> > > > yet available. On platform_probe() genpd_get_from_provider() returns
> > > > -ENOENT.
> > > >
> > > > Seems like other stuff is potentially broken too, any ideas on
> > > > how to fix this?
> > >
> > > I think I'm hit by this as well, although I do not get a lockup.
> > > In my case I'm using
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-tqma8mq-mba8mx.dts and probing of
> > > 38320000.blk-ctrl fails as the power-domain is not (yet) registed.
> >
> > Ok, took a look.
> >
> > The problem is that there are two drivers for the same device and they
> > both initialize this device.
> >
> >     gpc: gpc@...a0000 {
> >         compatible = "fsl,imx8mq-gpc";
> >     }
> >
> > $ git grep -l "fsl,imx7d-gpc" -- drivers/
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
> > drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c
> >
> > IMHO, this is a bad/broken design.
> >
> > So what's happening is that fw_devlink will block the probe of
> > 38320000.blk-ctrl until 303a0000.gpc is initialized. And it stops
> > blocking the probe of 38320000.blk-ctrl as soon as the first driver
> > initializes the device. In this case, it's the irqchip driver.
> >
> > I'd recommend combining these drivers into one. Something like the
> > patch I'm attaching (sorry for the attachment, copy-paste is mangling
> > the tabs). Can you give it a shot please?
>
> I tried this patch and it delayed the driver initialization (those of UART as
> well BTW). Unfortunately the driver fails the same way:

Thanks for testing the patch!

> > [    1.125253] imx8m-blk-ctrl 38320000.blk-ctrl: error -ENODEV: failed to
> attach power domain "bus"
>
> More than that it even introduced some more errors:
> > [    0.008160] irq: no irq domain found for gpc@...a0000 !

So the idea behind my change was that as long as the irqchip isn't the
root of the irqdomain (might be using the terms incorrectly) like the
gic, you can make it a platform driver. And I was trying to hack up a
patch that's the equivalent of platform_irqchip_probe() (which just
ends up eventually calling the callback you use in IRQCHIP_DECLARE().
I probably made some mistake in the quick hack that I'm sure if
fixable.

> > [    0.013251] Failed to map interrupt for
> > /soc@...us@...00000/timer@...a0000

However, this timer driver also uses TIMER_OF_DECLARE() which can't
handle failure to get the IRQ (because it's can't -EPROBE_DEFER). So,
this means, the timer driver inturn needs to be converted to a
platform driver if it's supposed to work with the IRQCHIP_DECLARE()
being converted to a platform driver.

But that's a can of worms not worth opening. But then I remembered
this simpler workaround will work and it is pretty much a variant of
the workaround that's already in the gpc's irqchip driver to allow two
drivers to probe the same device (people really should stop doing
that).

Can you drop my previous hack patch and try this instead please? I'm
99% sure this will work.

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
index b9c22f764b4d..8a0e82067924 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ static int __init imx_gpcv2_irqchip_init(struct
device_node *node,
         * later the GPC power domain driver will not be skipped.
         */
        of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
+       fwnode_dev_initialized(domain->fwnode, false);
        return 0;
 }

-Saravana

Powered by blists - more mailing lists