lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 09:56:56 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>
Cc:     brouer@...hat.com, jbrouer@...hat.com, hawk@...nel.org,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, lorenzo@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, lipeng321@...wei.com, chenhao288@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: page_pool: optimize page pool page
 allocation in NUMA scenario


On 01/07/2022 06.15, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:33:05 +0800 Guangbin Huang wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> +	pref_nid = (pool->p.nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) ? numa_mem_id() : pool->p.nid;
>> +#else
>> +	/* Ignore pool->p.nid setting if !CONFIG_NUMA */
>> +	pref_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> +#endif
> 
> Please factor this out to a helper, this is a copy of the code from
> page_pool_refill_alloc_cache() and #ifdefs are a little yuck.
> 

I would say simply use 'pool->p.nid' in the call to
alloc_pages_bulk_array_node() and drop this optimization (that was
copy-pasted from fast-path).

The optimization avoids one reading from memory compile time depending
on CONFIG_NUMA.  It is *not* worth doing in this code path which is even
named "slow" (__page_pool_alloc_pages_slow).

--Jesper

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ