netdev - Re: [PATCH v11 25/40] virtio: allow to unbreak/break virtqueue individually

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 17:36:32 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        kangjie.xu@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 25/40] virtio: allow to unbreak/break virtqueue
 individually


在 2022/7/1 14:31, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 02:56:41PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
>> This patch allows the new introduced
>> __virtqueue_break()/__virtqueue_unbreak() to break/unbreak the
>> virtqueue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> I wonder how this interacts with the hardening patches.
> Jason?


Consider we've marked it as broken, I think we don't need to care about 
the hardening in this series. Just make it work without hardening.

And I will handle vq reset when rework the IRQ hardening.

Thanks


>
>> ---
>>   drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/virtio.h       |  3 +++
>>   2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> index 5ec43607cc15..7b02be7fce67 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> @@ -2744,6 +2744,30 @@ unsigned int virtqueue_get_vring_size(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_get_vring_size);
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * This function should only be called by the core, not directly by the driver.
>> + */
>> +void __virtqueue_break(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>> +{
>> +	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>> +
>> +	/* Pairs with READ_ONCE() in virtqueue_is_broken(). */
>> +	WRITE_ONCE(vq->broken, true);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__virtqueue_break);
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * This function should only be called by the core, not directly by the driver.
>> + */
>> +void __virtqueue_unbreak(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>> +{
>> +	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>> +
>> +	/* Pairs with READ_ONCE() in virtqueue_is_broken(). */
>> +	WRITE_ONCE(vq->broken, false);
>> +}
> I don't think these "Pairs" comments have any value.
>
>
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__virtqueue_unbreak);
>> +
>>   bool virtqueue_is_broken(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>>   {
>>   	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
>> index 1272566adec6..dc474a0d48d1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
>> @@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ bool is_virtio_device(struct device *dev);
>>   void virtio_break_device(struct virtio_device *dev);
>>   void __virtio_unbreak_device(struct virtio_device *dev);
>>   
>> +void __virtqueue_break(struct virtqueue *_vq);
>> +void __virtqueue_unbreak(struct virtqueue *_vq);
>> +
>>   void virtio_config_changed(struct virtio_device *dev);
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>   int virtio_device_freeze(struct virtio_device *dev);
>> -- 
>> 2.31.0