[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OS0PR01MB5922F27CE118110DAA7686D386BF9@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2022 18:54:19 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: can: sja1000: Convert to json-schema
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the feedback.
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: can: sja1000: Convert to json-
> schema
>
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 11:47:00 +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> > Convert the NXP SJA1000 CAN Controller Device Tree binding
> > documentation to json-schema.
> >
> > Update the example to match reality.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> > v1->v2:
> > * Moved $ref: can-controller.yaml# to top along with if conditional
> > to   avoid multiple mapping issues with the if conditional in the
> subsequent
> > patch.
> > ---
> > .../bindings/net/can/nxp,sja1000.yaml | 102
> ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/sja1000.txt | 58 ----------
> > 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) create mode
> > 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/nxp,sja1000.yaml
> > delete mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/sja1000.txt
> >
>
> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
>
> Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
> This will change in the future.
>
OK.
>
> can@4,0: nxp,tx-output-config:0:0: 22 is not one of [1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16,
> 32, 48]
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27-phytec-phycore-rdk.dtb
Looks like this property is not enum, as combination possible with tx-output-config values for TX0 and TX1.
22 = 6 + 16 -> TX0 push-pull + TX1 pull-down
I will remove enums definition from the next version.
which will fix this error.
Also please let me know, is there any better way to handle
combination of enum values like above.
>
> can@4,0: 'reg-io-width' is a required property
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27-phytec-phycore-rdk.dtb
I have added this as per original documentation[1], it is ignored only for
Technologic. But after checking [2] none of them except Technologic is using reg-io
I will send V3 with fixing this.
[1] snippet from original bindings.
Optional properties:
reg-io-width : Specify the size (in bytes) of the IO accesses that
should be performed on the device. Valid value is 1, 2 or 4.
This property is ignored for technologic version.
Default to 1 (8 bits).
[2]
biju@...u-VirtualBox:~/linux-next$ fgrep -r "sja1000" arch
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/digsy_mtc.dts: compatible = "nxp,sja1000";
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/digsy_mtc.dts: compatible = "nxp,sja1000";
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/socrates.dts: compatible = "philips,sja1000";
Binary file arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-ts4800.dtb matches
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-ts4800.dts: compatible = "technologic,sja1000";
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx27-phytec-phycore-rdk.dts: compatible = "nxp,sja1000";
Cheers,
Biju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists