[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c3da9d8-20fb-81ef-23a6-ab88921cf0d2@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 21:10:56 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Erhard F." <erhard_f@...lbox.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] r8169: fix accessing unset transport header
On 04.07.2022 17:40, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> :
>> On 04.07.2022 02:55, Francois Romieu wrote:
>>> Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> :
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>>> [...]
>>>> @@ -4420,7 +4418,7 @@ static netdev_features_t rtl8169_features_check(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>>> if (rtl_quirk_packet_padto(tp, skb))
>>>> features &= ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
>>>>
>>>> - if (transport_offset > TCPHO_MAX &&
>>>> + if (skb_transport_offset(skb) > TCPHO_MAX &&
>>>> rtl_chip_supports_csum_v2(tp))
>>>> features &= ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Neither skb_is_gso nor CHECKSUM_PARTIAL implies a transport header so the
>>> warning may still trigger, right ?
>>
>> I'm not an expert here, and due to missing chip documentation I can't say
>> whether the chip could handle hw csumming correctly w/o transport header.
>> I'd see whether we get more reports of this warning. If yes, then maybe
>> we should use skb_transport_header_was_set() explicitly and disable
>> hw csumming if there's no transport header.
>
> (some sleep later)
>
> I had forgotten the NETIF_F_* stuff in the r8169 driver. :o/
>
> So, yes, ignore this point.
>
>>> Btw it's a bit unexpected to see a "Fixes" tag related to a RTL8125 bug as
>>> well as a "Tested-by" by the bugzilla submitter when the dmesg included in
>>> bz216157 exibits a RTL8168e/8111e.
>>>
>> The Fixes tag refers to the latest change to the affected code, therefore
>> it comes a little unexpected, right.
>
> ?
>
> 8d520b4de3ed does not change the affected code.
>
This chunk of 8d520b4de3ed
@@ -4128,9 +4183,10 @@ static bool rtl8169_tso_csum_v2(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
opts[1] |= transport_offset << TCPHO_SHIFT;
} else {
- if (unlikely(skb->len < ETH_ZLEN && rtl_test_hw_pad_bug(tp)))
- /* eth_skb_pad would free the skb on error */
- return !__skb_put_padto(skb, ETH_ZLEN, false);
+ unsigned int padto = rtl_quirk_packet_padto(tp, skb);
+
+ /* skb_padto would free the skb on error */
+ return !__skb_put_padto(skb, padto, false);
}
return true;
changes the context for this part of the patch. Therefore the patch wouldn't
apply cleanly.
@@ -4235,7 +4234,7 @@ static bool rtl8169_tso_csum_v2(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
else
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- opts[1] |= transport_offset << TCPHO_SHIFT;
+ opts[1] |= skb_transport_offset(skb) << TCPHO_SHIFT;
} else {
unsigned int padto = rtl_quirk_packet_padto(tp, skb);
> Eric's unset transport offset detection debug code would have produced the
> same output with the parent of the "Fixes" commit id:
>
I know, but due to the fact that the warnings are harmless and the new check
doesn't exist in earlier versions, I think we can omit these kernel versions.
> $ git cat-file -p 8d520b4de3ed^:drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | grep -A4 -B1 -E 'rtl8169_features_check'
>
> static netdev_features_t rtl8169_features_check(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct net_device *dev,
> netdev_features_t features)
> {
> int transport_offset = skb_transport_offset(skb);
> --
> .ndo_start_xmit = rtl8169_start_xmit,
> .ndo_features_check = rtl8169_features_check,
> .ndo_tx_timeout = rtl8169_tx_timeout,
> .ndo_validate_addr = eth_validate_addr,
> .ndo_change_mtu = rtl8169_change_mtu,
> .ndo_fix_features = rtl8169_fix_features,
>
>
> -> 8d520b4de3ed does not modify the first
> 'int transport_offset = skb_transport_offset(skb);' statement and neither
> does it modify the code path to rtl8169_features_check
>
> 8d520b4de3ed actually removes some logical path towards rtl8169_tso_csum_v2
> but it does not change (nor does it break) the relevant code:
>
> $ git cat-file -p 8d520b4de3ed^:drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | grep -A3 -B1 -E 'bool rtl8169_tso_csum_v2'
>
> static bool rtl8169_tso_csum_v2(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
> struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *opts)
> {
> u32 transport_offset = (u32)skb_transport_offset(skb);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists