[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220706101459.tahby2xpm3e7okjz@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 13:14:59 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/5] net: dsa: always use phylink
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 09:42:33AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 7/5/22 02:46, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > A new revision of the series which incorporates changes that Marek
> > suggested. Specifically, the changes are:
> >
> > 1. Patch 2 - use the phylink_get_caps method in mv88e6xxx to get the
> > default interface rather than re-using port_max_speed_mode()
> >
> > 2. Patch 4 - if no default interface is provided, use the supported
> > interface mask to search for the first interface that gives the
> > fastest speed.
> >
> > 3. Patch 5 - now also removes the port_max_speed_mode() method
>
> This was tested with bcm_sf2.c and b53_srab.b and did not cause regressions,
> however we do have a 'fixed-link' property for the CPU port (always have had
> one), so there was no regression expected.
What about arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47189-tenda-ac9.dts?
Just to make sure I'm simply not seeing something, I compiled and then
decompiled the dtb. We have:
ethernet@...0 {
reg = <0x5000 0x1000>;
phandle = <0x03>;
mdio {
#address-cells = <0x01>;
#size-cells = <0x00>;
switch@1e {
compatible = "brcm,bcm53125";
reg = <0x1e>;
status = "okay";
ports {
#address-cells = <0x01>;
#size-cells = <0x00>;
port@0 {
reg = <0x00>;
label = "wan";
};
port@1 {
reg = <0x01>;
label = "lan1";
};
port@2 {
reg = <0x02>;
label = "lan2";
};
port@3 {
reg = <0x03>;
label = "lan3";
};
port@4 {
reg = <0x04>;
label = "lan4";
};
port@5 {
reg = <0x05>;
label = "cpu";
ethernet = <0x03>; <- CPU port with no phy-handle, no fixed-link
};
};
};
};
};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists