lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAM0EoMnoJq_4BRoTUxoSMfWDnydWC4xJhuhrfmpWC5AujmLrow@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 07:26:13 -0400 From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Report: iproute2 build broken? On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 3:07 PM Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 20:17:51 +0300 > Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 12:59:45PM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > > > Thanks Ido. That fixed it. > > > General question: do we need a "stable" iproute2? > > > > Maybe a new point release is enough (e.g., 5.18.1)? > > > I don't think this is urgent enough for another release. I was more wondering whether such a process even existed - it seems to but then what is the criteria for deciding something deserves another release? What was the motivation the last time? Distros did their own thing in the past... cheers, jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists