[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d65824fc-a139-0430-5550-481dd202ad34@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 09:27:20 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v2 0/5] net: dsa: always use phylink
On 7/6/22 03:14, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 09:42:33AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 7/5/22 02:46, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> A new revision of the series which incorporates changes that Marek
>>> suggested. Specifically, the changes are:
>>>
>>> 1. Patch 2 - use the phylink_get_caps method in mv88e6xxx to get the
>>> default interface rather than re-using port_max_speed_mode()
>>>
>>> 2. Patch 4 - if no default interface is provided, use the supported
>>> interface mask to search for the first interface that gives the
>>> fastest speed.
>>>
>>> 3. Patch 5 - now also removes the port_max_speed_mode() method
>>
>> This was tested with bcm_sf2.c and b53_srab.b and did not cause regressions,
>> however we do have a 'fixed-link' property for the CPU port (always have had
>> one), so there was no regression expected.
>
> What about arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm47189-tenda-ac9.dts?
You found one of the devices that I do not have access to and did not
test, thanks. We do expect to run the port at 2GBits/sec on these
devices however there is no "official" way to advertise that a port can
run at 2Gbits/sec, as this is not even a "sanctioned" speed. I do have a
similar device however, so let me run some more tests, we won't see a
regression however since we do not use the NATP accelerator which would
be the reason to run the port at 2Gbits/sec.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists