netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/2] Fix police 'continue' action offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220706054610.peqqedlbwgzpiys2@sx1>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:46:10 -0700
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        jianbol@...dia.com, idosch@...dia.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        maord@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] Fix police 'continue' action offload

On 05 Jul 17:11, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 22:44:03 +0200 Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> TC act_police with 'continue' action had been supported by mlx5 matchall
>> classifier offload implementation for some time. However, 'continue' was
>> assumed implicitly and recently got broken in multiple places. Fix it in
>> both TC hardware offload validation code and mlx5 driver.
>
>Saeed, ack or should they go via your tree?
>
>The signals are a little mixed since the tree in the subject is "net"
>which makes sense but there's no ack / sob from Saeed.

Acked, vlad was under pressure to submit this I told him to go ahead and I
will ack on the list.