lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a93e5967-026a-186d-2bf0-5628631b9e28@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:17:16 +0200
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     regressions@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf v3] netfilter: conntrack: fix crash due to confirmed
 bit load reordering

On 06.07.22 16:50, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Kajetan Puchalski reports crash on ARM, with backtrace of:
> 
> [...]
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Reported-by: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@....com>
> Diagnosed-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Fixes: 719774377622 ("netfilter: conntrack: convert to refcount_t api")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

If you need to respin this patch for one reason or another, could you do
me a favor and add proper 'Link:' tags pointing to all reports about
this issue? e.g. like this:

 Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yr7WTfd6AVTQkLjI@e126311.manchester.arm.com/

These tags are considered important by Linus[1] and others, as they
allow anyone to look into the backstory weeks or years from now. That is
why they should be placed in cases like this, as
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and
Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst explain in more detail. I care
personally, because these tags make my regression tracking efforts a
whole lot easier, as they allow my tracking bot 'regzbot' to
automatically connect reports with patches posted or committed to fix
tracked regressions.

[1] see for example:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjMmSZzMJ3Xnskdg4+GGz=5p5p+GSYyFBTh0f-DgvdBWg@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgs38ZrfPvy=nOwVkVzjpM3VFU1zobP37Fwd_h9iAD5JQ@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjxzafG-=J8oT30s7upn4RhBs6TX-uVFZ5rME+L5_DoJA@mail.gmail.com/

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)

P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists