netdev - Re: [PATCH] smc: fix refcount bug in sk_psock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Jul 2022 20:06:02 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@...il.com>
Cc:     syzbot+5f26f85569bd179c18ce@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, borisp@...dia.com,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kafai@...com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, songliubraving@...com,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yhs@...com,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, 18801353760@....com,
        paskripkin@...il.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smc: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2)

On Sat,  9 Jul 2022 10:46:59 +0800 Hawkins Jiawei wrote:
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5f26f85569bd179c18ce@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: hawk <18801353760@....com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/tcp.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 9984d23a7f3e..a1e6cab2c748 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -3395,10 +3395,23 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
>  	}
>  	case TCP_ULP: {
>  		char name[TCP_ULP_NAME_MAX];
> +		struct sock *smc_sock;
>  
>  		if (optlen < 1)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> +		/* SMC sk_user_data may be treated as psock,
> +		 * which triggers a refcnt warning.
> +		 */
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		smc_sock = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
> +		if (level == SOL_TCP && smc_sock &&
> +		    smc_sock->__sk_common.skc_family == AF_SMC) {

This should prolly be under the socket lock?

Can we add a bit to SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK and have ULP-compatible
users (sockmap) opt into ULP cooperation? Modifying TCP is backwards,
layer-wise.

> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		}
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +