[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR2101MB1327F4D818A94D4D1C588F09BF879@SN6PR2101MB1327.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 01:31:35 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>, KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"shiraz.saleem@...el.com" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Ajay Sharma <sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>
CC: "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v4 07/12] net: mana: Export Work Queue functions for use
by RDMA driver
> From: longli@...uxonhyperv.com <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 7:07 PM
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ int mana_gd_send_request(struct gdma_context *gc,
> u32 req_len, const void *req,
>
> return mana_hwc_send_request(hwc, req_len, req, resp_len, resp);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mana_gd_send_request);
Can we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
> @@ -715,9 +715,10 @@ static int mana_create_wq_obj(struct
> mana_port_context *apc,
> out:
> return err;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mana_create_wq_obj);
Well, here we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. If there is a rule to decide
which one should be used, please add a comment.
In general, the patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists