[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220711132607.2654337-2-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:26:05 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, mlxsw@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
moshe@...dia.com
Subject: [patch net-next v3/repost 1/3] net: devlink: fix unlocked vs locked functions descriptions
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
To be unified with the rest of the code, the unlocked version (devl_*)
of function should have the same description in documentation as the
locked one. Add the missing documentation. Also, add "Context"
annotation for the locked versions where it is missing.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
v1->v2:
- s/devlink_/devl_/ for unregister comment
- removed tabs
- added ()s
---
net/core/devlink.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index db61f3a341cb..0bb9b1f497c7 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -9677,6 +9677,19 @@ static void devlink_port_type_warn_cancel(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&devlink_port->type_warn_dw);
}
+/**
+ * devl_port_register() - Register devlink port
+ *
+ * @devlink: devlink
+ * @devlink_port: devlink port
+ * @port_index: driver-specific numerical identifier of the port
+ *
+ * Register devlink port with provided port index. User can use
+ * any indexing, even hw-related one. devlink_port structure
+ * is convenient to be embedded inside user driver private structure.
+ * Note that the caller should take care of zeroing the devlink_port
+ * structure.
+ */
int devl_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
unsigned int port_index)
@@ -9715,6 +9728,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_port_register);
* is convenient to be embedded inside user driver private structure.
* Note that the caller should take care of zeroing the devlink_port
* structure.
+ *
+ * Context: Takes and release devlink->lock <mutex>.
*/
int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
@@ -9729,6 +9744,11 @@ int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_register);
+/**
+ * devl_port_unregister() - Unregister devlink port
+ *
+ * @devlink_port: devlink port
+ */
void devl_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&devlink_port->devlink->lock);
@@ -9746,6 +9766,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_port_unregister);
* devlink_port_unregister - Unregister devlink port
*
* @devlink_port: devlink port
+ *
+ * Context: Takes and release devlink->lock <mutex>.
*/
void devlink_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
{
@@ -10006,6 +10028,15 @@ int devl_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_rate_leaf_create);
+/**
+ * devlink_rate_leaf_create - create devlink rate leaf
+ * @devlink_port: devlink port object to create rate object on
+ * @priv: driver private data
+ *
+ * Create devlink rate object of type leaf on provided @devlink_port.
+ *
+ * Context: Takes and release devlink->lock <mutex>.
+ */
int
devlink_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv)
{
@@ -10020,6 +10051,11 @@ devlink_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_rate_leaf_create);
+/**
+ * devl_rate_leaf_destroy - destroy devlink rate leaf
+ *
+ * @devlink_port: devlink port linked to the rate object
+ */
void devl_rate_leaf_destroy(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
{
struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate = devlink_port->devlink_rate;
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists