netdev - Re: [PATCH] mm: prevent page_frag_alloc() from corrupting the memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 18:17:38 +0200
From:   Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Chen Lin <chen45464546@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: prevent page_frag_alloc() from corrupting the memory

po 11. 7. 2022 v 17:34 odesílatel Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@...il.com> napsal:
>
> Rather than forcing us to free the page it might be better to move the
> lines getting the size and computing the offset to the top of the "if
> (unlikely(offset < 0)) {" block. Then instead of freeing the page we
> could just return NULL and don't have to change the value of any
> fields in the page_frag_cache.
>
> That way a driver performing bad requests can't force us to start
> allocating and freeing pages like mad by repeatedly flushing the
> cache.
>

I understand. On the other hand, if we free the cache page then the
next time __page_frag_cache_refill() runs it may be successful
at allocating the order=3 cache, the normal page_frag_alloc() behaviour will
therefore be restored.

Maurizio