lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 19:10:48 -0700
From:   Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
        katie.morris@...advantage.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 0/9] add support for VSC7512 control over SPI

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:21:16AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:51:35 +0100 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Can this go into net-next if there are no more complains over the
> > > weekend? Anyone still planning to review?  
> > 
> > As the subsystem with the fewest changes, I'm not sure why it would.
> 
> Yeah, just going by the tag in the subject. I have no preference,
> looks like it applies cleanly to Linus'.
> 
> > I'd planed to route this in via MFD and send out a pull-request for
> > other sub-system maintainers to pull from.
> > 
> > If you would like to co-ordinate it instead, you'd be welcome to.
> > However, I (and probably Linus) would need a succinct immutable branch
> > to pull from.
> 
> Oh, that'd be perfect, sorry, I didn't realize there was already a plan.
> If you're willing to carry on as intended, please do.
> 
> Colin if there is another version please make a note of the above
> merging plan in the cover letter and drop the net-next tag. 
> Just in  case my goldfish brain forgets.

I wasn't sure of the plan, but this makes sense to bring it through MFD.
Fortunately there's enough work for me on the DSA front that there's no
way that'll land before this merge window - so I have no objection to it
going any non-net-next path.

I'll look to Lee as to whether there should be a v14 with the header
guard addition per Vladimir's review, or whether that should be in a
future patch set. I'm happy to go either way.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ