[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220711065907.23105-1-hbh25y@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:59:07 +0800
From: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
To: ericvh@...il.com, lucho@...kov.net, asmadeus@...ewreck.org,
linux_oss@...debyte.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, tomasbortoli@...il.com
Cc: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: 9p: fix possible refcount leak in p9_read_work() and recv_done()
A ref got in p9_tag_lookup needs to be put when functions enter the
error path.
Fix this by adding p9_req_put in error path.
Fixes: 728356dedeff ("9p: Add refcount to p9_req_t")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
---
net/9p/trans_fd.c | 3 +++
net/9p/trans_rdma.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index 8f8f95e39b03..c4ccb7b9e1bf 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -343,6 +343,7 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR,
"No recv fcall for tag %d (req %p), disconnecting!\n",
m->rc.tag, m->rreq);
+ p9_req_put(m->rreq);
m->rreq = NULL;
err = -EIO;
goto error;
@@ -372,6 +373,8 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
"Request tag %d errored out while we were reading the reply\n",
m->rc.tag);
err = -EIO;
+ p9_req_put(m->rreq);
+ m->rreq = NULL;
goto error;
}
spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_rdma.c b/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
index 88e563826674..82b5d6894ee2 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_rdma.c
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
/* Check that we have not yet received a reply for this request.
*/
if (unlikely(req->rc.sdata)) {
+ p9_req_put(req);
pr_err("Duplicate reply for request %d", tag);
goto err_out;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists