[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220711081408.69452-9-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 01:14:07 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 8/9] net/mlx5: Remove devl_unlock from mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set
From: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
The callback mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set() had unlocked devlink as a
temporary workaround once devlink instance lock was added to devlink
eswitch callbacks. Now that all flows triggered by this function
that took devlink lock are using devl_ API and all parallel paths are
locked we can remove this workaround.
Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
.../mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 20 -------------------
1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index ccda3a0a2594..d3da52e3fc67 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -2177,10 +2177,8 @@ static int esw_create_restore_table(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
static int esw_offloads_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
- struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(esw->dev);
int err, err1;
- devl_lock(devlink);
esw->mode = MLX5_ESWITCH_OFFLOADS;
err = mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked(esw, esw->dev->priv.sriov.num_vfs);
if (err) {
@@ -2202,7 +2200,6 @@ static int esw_offloads_start(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
"Inline mode is different between vports");
}
}
- devl_unlock(devlink);
return err;
}
@@ -3243,10 +3240,8 @@ int esw_offloads_enable(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
static int esw_offloads_stop(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
- struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(esw->dev);
int err, err1;
- devl_lock(devlink);
esw->mode = MLX5_ESWITCH_LEGACY;
err = mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked(esw, MLX5_ESWITCH_IGNORE_NUM_VFS);
if (err) {
@@ -3258,7 +3253,6 @@ static int esw_offloads_stop(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
"Failed setting eswitch back to offloads");
}
}
- devl_unlock(devlink);
return err;
}
@@ -3366,15 +3360,6 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u16 mode,
if (esw_mode_from_devlink(mode, &mlx5_mode))
return -EINVAL;
- /* FIXME: devl_unlock() followed by devl_lock() inside driver callback
- * is never correct and prone to races. It's a transitional workaround,
- * never repeat this pattern.
- *
- * This code MUST be fixed before removing devlink_mutex as it is safe
- * to do only because of that mutex.
- */
- devl_unlock(devlink);
-
mlx5_lag_disable_change(esw->dev);
err = mlx5_esw_try_lock(esw);
if (err < 0) {
@@ -3387,9 +3372,7 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u16 mode,
if (cur_mlx5_mode == mlx5_mode)
goto unlock;
- devl_lock(devlink);
mlx5_eswitch_disable_locked(esw);
- devl_unlock(devlink);
if (mode == DEVLINK_ESWITCH_MODE_SWITCHDEV) {
if (mlx5_devlink_trap_get_num_active(esw->dev)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
@@ -3400,9 +3383,7 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u16 mode,
err = esw_offloads_start(esw, extack);
} else if (mode == DEVLINK_ESWITCH_MODE_LEGACY) {
err = esw_offloads_stop(esw, extack);
- devl_lock(devlink);
mlx5_rescan_drivers(esw->dev);
- devl_unlock(devlink);
} else {
err = -EINVAL;
}
@@ -3411,7 +3392,6 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u16 mode,
mlx5_esw_unlock(esw);
enable_lag:
mlx5_lag_enable_change(esw->dev);
- devl_lock(devlink);
return err;
}
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists