[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220711082404.GM566407@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 10:24:04 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tobias Brunner" <tobias@...ongswan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 1/4] Revert "xfrm: update SA curlft.use_time"
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 08:16:28AM +0200, Antony Antony wrote:
> This reverts commit af734a26a1a95a9fda51f2abb0c22a7efcafd5ca.
>
> The abvoce commit is a regression according RFC 2367. A better fix would be
> use x->lastused. Which will be propsed later.
>
> according to RFC 2367 use_time == sadb_lifetime_usetime.
>
> "sadb_lifetime_usetime
> For CURRENT, the time, in seconds, when association
> was first used. For HARD and SOFT, the number of
> seconds after the first use of the association until
> it expires."
>
> Fixes: af734a26a1a9 ("xfrm: update SA curlft.use_time")
> Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
This is a fix, so it should go to the ipsec tree. Please
slpit your patchset into fixes that go to the ipsec tree
and new features that go to ipsec-next.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists