[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220712102424.2774011-2-jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:24:22 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, mlxsw@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
moshe@...dia.com
Subject: [patch net-next v4 1/3] net: devlink: fix unlocked vs locked functions descriptions
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
To be unified with the rest of the code, the unlocked version (devl_*)
of function should have the same description in documentation as the
locked one. Add the missing documentation. Also, add "Context"
annotation for the locked versions where it is missing.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
v3->v4:
- rebased on top of Mosche's patchset (trivial)
v1->v2:
- s/devlink_/devl_/ for unregister comment
- removed tabs
- added ()s
---
net/core/devlink.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index e206cc90bec5..8cef65a6934d 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -9673,6 +9673,19 @@ static void devlink_port_type_warn_cancel(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&devlink_port->type_warn_dw);
}
+/**
+ * devl_port_register() - Register devlink port
+ *
+ * @devlink: devlink
+ * @devlink_port: devlink port
+ * @port_index: driver-specific numerical identifier of the port
+ *
+ * Register devlink port with provided port index. User can use
+ * any indexing, even hw-related one. devlink_port structure
+ * is convenient to be embedded inside user driver private structure.
+ * Note that the caller should take care of zeroing the devlink_port
+ * structure.
+ */
int devl_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
unsigned int port_index)
@@ -9711,6 +9724,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_port_register);
* is convenient to be embedded inside user driver private structure.
* Note that the caller should take care of zeroing the devlink_port
* structure.
+ *
+ * Context: Takes and release devlink->lock <mutex>.
*/
int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
struct devlink_port *devlink_port,
@@ -9725,6 +9740,11 @@ int devlink_port_register(struct devlink *devlink,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_port_register);
+/**
+ * devl_port_unregister() - Unregister devlink port
+ *
+ * @devlink_port: devlink port
+ */
void devl_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&devlink_port->devlink->lock);
@@ -9742,6 +9762,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_port_unregister);
* devlink_port_unregister - Unregister devlink port
*
* @devlink_port: devlink port
+ *
+ * Context: Takes and release devlink->lock <mutex>.
*/
void devlink_port_unregister(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
{
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists