lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ys1+ujEnt+dvNw2y@nanopsycho>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:01:30 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, mlxsw@...dia.com,
        saeedm@...dia.com, moshe@...dia.com, tariqt@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 07/10] mlxsw: convert driver to use unlocked
 devlink API during init/fini

Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:33:14PM CEST, idosch@...dia.com wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:05:08PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
>> index ab1cebf227fb..b0267e4dca27 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c
>> @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static int mlxsw_core_resources_ports_register(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core)
>>  					  max_ports, 1,
>>  					  DEVLINK_RESOURCE_UNIT_ENTRY);
>>  
>> -	return devlink_resource_register(devlink,
>> -					 DEVLINK_RESOURCE_GENERIC_NAME_PORTS,
>> -					 max_ports, MLXSW_CORE_RESOURCE_PORTS,
>> -					 DEVLINK_RESOURCE_ID_PARENT_TOP,
>> -					 &ports_num_params);
>> +	return devl_resource_register(devlink,
>> +				      DEVLINK_RESOURCE_GENERIC_NAME_PORTS,
>> +				      max_ports, MLXSW_CORE_RESOURCE_PORTS,
>> +				      DEVLINK_RESOURCE_ID_PARENT_TOP,
>> +				      &ports_num_params);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int mlxsw_ports_init(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core, bool reload)
>> @@ -157,8 +157,8 @@ static int mlxsw_ports_init(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core, bool reload)
>>  			goto err_resources_ports_register;
>>  	}
>>  	atomic_set(&mlxsw_core->active_ports_count, 0);
>> -	devlink_resource_occ_get_register(devlink, MLXSW_CORE_RESOURCE_PORTS,
>> -					  mlxsw_ports_occ_get, mlxsw_core);
>> +	devl_resource_occ_get_register(devlink, MLXSW_CORE_RESOURCE_PORTS,
>> +				       mlxsw_ports_occ_get, mlxsw_core);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  
>> @@ -171,9 +171,9 @@ static void mlxsw_ports_fini(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core, bool reload)
>>  {
>>  	struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(mlxsw_core);
>>  
>> -	devlink_resource_occ_get_unregister(devlink, MLXSW_CORE_RESOURCE_PORTS);
>> +	devl_resource_occ_get_unregister(devlink, MLXSW_CORE_RESOURCE_PORTS);
>>  	if (!reload)
>> -		devlink_resources_unregister(priv_to_devlink(mlxsw_core));
>> +		devl_resources_unregister(priv_to_devlink(mlxsw_core));
>>  
>>  	kfree(mlxsw_core->ports);
>>  }
>> @@ -1485,10 +1485,12 @@ mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_down(struct devlink *devlink,
>>  {
>>  	struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
>>  
>> +	devl_lock(devlink);
>>  	if (!(mlxsw_core->bus->features & MLXSW_BUS_F_RESET))
>>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
>Not releasing the lock. You can take it after this check as these
>features do not change

Yep.


>
>>  
>>  	mlxsw_core_bus_device_unregister(mlxsw_core, true);
>> +	devl_unlock(devlink);
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -1498,13 +1500,17 @@ mlxsw_devlink_core_bus_device_reload_up(struct devlink *devlink, enum devlink_re
>>  					struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>>  {
>>  	struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> +	int err;
>>  
>> +	devl_lock(devlink);
>>  	*actions_performed = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
>>  			     BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE);
>> -	return mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(mlxsw_core->bus_info,
>> -					      mlxsw_core->bus,
>> -					      mlxsw_core->bus_priv, true,
>> -					      devlink, extack);
>> +	err = mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(mlxsw_core->bus_info,
>> +					     mlxsw_core->bus,
>> +					     mlxsw_core->bus_priv, true,
>> +					     devlink, extack);
>> +	devl_unlock(devlink);
>> +	return err;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int mlxsw_devlink_flash_update(struct devlink *devlink,
>> @@ -2102,6 +2108,7 @@ __mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(const struct mlxsw_bus_info *mlxsw_bus_info,
>>  			err = -ENOMEM;
>>  			goto err_devlink_alloc;
>>  		}
>> +		devl_lock(devlink);
>
>Why not just take it in mlxsw_core_bus_device_register() if '!reload' ?
>Easier to read and also consistent with the change in
>mlxsw_core_bus_device_unregister()

Will check.


>
>
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	mlxsw_core = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> @@ -2188,6 +2195,7 @@ __mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(const struct mlxsw_bus_info *mlxsw_bus_info,
>>  	if (!reload) {
>>  		devlink_set_features(devlink, DEVLINK_F_RELOAD);
>>  		devlink_register(devlink);
>> +		devl_unlock(devlink);
>
>Did you check this with lockdep? devlink_register() now acquires the
>global devlink mutex under the per-instance lock, but devlink core uses
>the reverse order.

Correct. I have another patch in queue which removes devlink_mutex from
register/unregister, so that fixed it for me.


>
>>  	}
>>  	return 0;
>>  
>> @@ -2214,12 +2222,14 @@ __mlxsw_core_bus_device_register(const struct mlxsw_bus_info *mlxsw_bus_info,
>>  	mlxsw_ports_fini(mlxsw_core, reload);
>>  err_ports_init:
>>  	if (!reload)
>> -		devlink_resources_unregister(devlink);
>> +		devl_resources_unregister(devlink);
>>  err_register_resources:
>>  	mlxsw_bus->fini(bus_priv);
>>  err_bus_init:
>> -	if (!reload)
>> +	if (!reload) {
>> +		devl_unlock(devlink);
>>  		devlink_free(devlink);
>> +	}
>>  err_devlink_alloc:
>>  	return err;
>>  }
>> @@ -2255,8 +2265,10 @@ void mlxsw_core_bus_device_unregister(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core,
>>  {
>>  	struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(mlxsw_core);
>>  
>> -	if (!reload)
>> +	if (!reload) {
>> +		devl_lock(devlink);
>>  		devlink_unregister(devlink);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	if (devlink_is_reload_failed(devlink)) {
>>  		if (!reload)
>> @@ -2281,17 +2293,20 @@ void mlxsw_core_bus_device_unregister(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core,
>>  	kfree(mlxsw_core->lag.mapping);
>>  	mlxsw_ports_fini(mlxsw_core, reload);
>>  	if (!reload)
>> -		devlink_resources_unregister(devlink);
>> +		devl_resources_unregister(devlink);
>>  	mlxsw_core->bus->fini(mlxsw_core->bus_priv);
>> -	if (!reload)
>> +	if (!reload) {
>>  		devlink_free(devlink);
>> +		devl_unlock(devlink);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	return;
>>  
>>  reload_fail_deinit:
>>  	mlxsw_core_params_unregister(mlxsw_core);
>> -	devlink_resources_unregister(devlink);
>> +	devl_resources_unregister(devlink);
>>  	devlink_free(devlink);
>> +	devl_unlock(devlink);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mlxsw_core_bus_device_unregister);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ