netdev - [PATCH net-next v5 26/27] io_uring: enable managed frags with register buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 21:52:50 +0100
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        kernel-team@...com, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 26/27] io_uring: enable managed frags with register buffers

io_uring's registered buffers infra has a good performant way of pinning
pages, so let's use SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAG_REFS when our requests are purely
register buffer backed.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
 io_uring/net.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
index bf9916d5e50c..a4e863dce7ec 100644
--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -704,6 +704,60 @@ int io_sendzc_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int io_sg_from_iter(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+			   struct iov_iter *from, size_t length)
+{
+	struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
+	int frag = shinfo->nr_frags;
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct bvec_iter bi;
+	ssize_t copied = 0;
+	unsigned long truesize = 0;
+
+	if (!shinfo->nr_frags)
+		shinfo->flags |= SKBFL_MANAGED_FRAG_REFS;
+
+	if (!skb_zcopy_managed(skb) || !iov_iter_is_bvec(from)) {
+		skb_zcopy_downgrade_managed(skb);
+		return __zerocopy_sg_from_iter(NULL, sk, skb, from, length);
+	}
+
+	bi.bi_size = min(from->count, length);
+	bi.bi_bvec_done = from->iov_offset;
+	bi.bi_idx = 0;
+
+	while (bi.bi_size && frag < MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
+		struct bio_vec v = mp_bvec_iter_bvec(from->bvec, bi);
+
+		copied += v.bv_len;
+		truesize += PAGE_ALIGN(v.bv_len + v.bv_offset);
+		__skb_fill_page_desc_noacc(shinfo, frag++, v.bv_page,
+					   v.bv_offset, v.bv_len);
+		bvec_iter_advance_single(from->bvec, &bi, v.bv_len);
+	}
+	if (bi.bi_size)
+		ret = -EMSGSIZE;
+
+	shinfo->nr_frags = frag;
+	from->bvec += bi.bi_idx;
+	from->nr_segs -= bi.bi_idx;
+	from->count = bi.bi_size;
+	from->iov_offset = bi.bi_bvec_done;
+
+	skb->data_len += copied;
+	skb->len += copied;
+	skb->truesize += truesize;
+
+	if (sk && sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM) {
+		sk_wmem_queued_add(sk, truesize);
+		if (!skb_zcopy_pure(skb))
+			sk_mem_charge(sk, truesize);
+	} else {
+		refcount_add(truesize, &skb->sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 int io_sendzc(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
 	struct sockaddr_storage address;
@@ -768,7 +822,7 @@ int io_sendzc(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 
 	msg.msg_flags = msg_flags;
 	msg.msg_ubuf = &notif->uarg;
-	msg.sg_from_iter = NULL;
+	msg.sg_from_iter = io_sg_from_iter;
 	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
 
 	if (unlikely(ret < min_ret)) {
-- 
2.37.0