[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220713085620.102550-1-simon.horman@corigine.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:56:20 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com
Subject: [PATCH net] nfp: flower: configure tunnel neighbour on cmsg rx
From: Tianyu Yuan <tianyu.yuan@...igine.com>
nfp_tun_write_neigh() function will configure a tunnel neighbour when
calling nfp_tun_neigh_event_handler() or nfp_flower_cmsg_process_one_rx()
(with no tunnel neighbour type) from firmware.
When configuring IP on physical port as a tunnel endpoint, no operation
will be performed after receiving the cmsg mentioned above.
Therefore, add a progress to configure tunnel neighbour in this case.
Fixes: f1df7956c11f("nfp: flower: rework tunnel neighbour configuration")
Signed-off-by: Tianyu Yuan <tianyu.yuan@...igine.com>
Reviewed-by: Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>
Reviewed-by: Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
---
.../netronome/nfp/flower/tunnel_conf.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/tunnel_conf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/tunnel_conf.c
index 6bf3ec448e7e..97dcf8db7ed2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/tunnel_conf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/tunnel_conf.c
@@ -447,7 +447,8 @@ void nfp_tun_unlink_and_update_nn_entries(struct nfp_app *app,
static void
nfp_tun_write_neigh(struct net_device *netdev, struct nfp_app *app,
- void *flow, struct neighbour *neigh, bool is_ipv6)
+ void *flow, struct neighbour *neigh, bool is_ipv6,
+ bool override)
{
bool neigh_invalid = !(neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID) || neigh->dead;
size_t neigh_size = is_ipv6 ? sizeof(struct nfp_tun_neigh_v6) :
@@ -546,6 +547,13 @@ nfp_tun_write_neigh(struct net_device *netdev, struct nfp_app *app,
if (nn_entry->flow)
list_del(&nn_entry->list_head);
kfree(nn_entry);
+ } else if (nn_entry && !neigh_invalid && override) {
+ mtype = is_ipv6 ? NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_TYPE_TUN_NEIGH_V6 :
+ NFP_FLOWER_CMSG_TYPE_TUN_NEIGH;
+ nfp_tun_link_predt_entries(app, nn_entry);
+ nfp_flower_xmit_tun_conf(app, mtype, neigh_size,
+ nn_entry->payload,
+ GFP_ATOMIC);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&priv->predt_lock);
@@ -610,7 +618,7 @@ nfp_tun_neigh_event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
dst_release(dst);
}
- nfp_tun_write_neigh(n->dev, app, &flow6, n, true);
+ nfp_tun_write_neigh(n->dev, app, &flow6, n, true, false);
#else
return NOTIFY_DONE;
#endif /* CONFIG_IPV6 */
@@ -633,7 +641,7 @@ nfp_tun_neigh_event_handler(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
ip_rt_put(rt);
}
- nfp_tun_write_neigh(n->dev, app, &flow4, n, false);
+ nfp_tun_write_neigh(n->dev, app, &flow4, n, false, false);
}
#else
return NOTIFY_DONE;
@@ -676,7 +684,7 @@ void nfp_tunnel_request_route_v4(struct nfp_app *app, struct sk_buff *skb)
ip_rt_put(rt);
if (!n)
goto fail_rcu_unlock;
- nfp_tun_write_neigh(n->dev, app, &flow, n, false);
+ nfp_tun_write_neigh(n->dev, app, &flow, n, false, true);
neigh_release(n);
rcu_read_unlock();
return;
@@ -718,7 +726,7 @@ void nfp_tunnel_request_route_v6(struct nfp_app *app, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (!n)
goto fail_rcu_unlock;
- nfp_tun_write_neigh(n->dev, app, &flow, n, true);
+ nfp_tun_write_neigh(n->dev, app, &flow, n, true, true);
neigh_release(n);
rcu_read_unlock();
return;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists