[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220713035344.60733-1-yin31149@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:53:44 +0800
From: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@...il.com>
To: kuba@...nel.org
Cc: 18801353760@....com, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
borisp@...dia.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kafai@...com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, paskripkin@...il.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
songliubraving@...com,
syzbot+5f26f85569bd179c18ce@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yhs@...com, yin31149@...il.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smc: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2)
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 11:33, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:10:05 +0800 Hawkins Jiawei wrote:
> > In Patchwork website, this patch fails the checks on
> > netdev/cc_maintainers. If this patch fails for some other reasons,
> > I will still fix this bug from SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK,
> > as a temporary solution.
>
> That check just runs scripts/get_maintainer.pl so make sure you CC
> folks pointed out by that script and you should be fine.
Thanks for your reply, yet I am not the patch's author, I
found this patch during my bug analysis.
I will reply the relative email to remind the patch's author.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists