[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4eccb16-3b45-1644-d4b0-ee3fee3810d9@6wind.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:36:37 +0200
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests/net: test nexthop without gw
Le 13/07/2022 à 02:25, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:14:17 +0200 Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:55:45AM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> This test implement the scenario described in the previous patch.
>>
>> "previous patch" does not work well when things are committed to the
>> kernel tree. Please be descriptive.
>
> And please don't resend your patches in reply to the previous version.
> Add a lore link to the previous version in the commit message if you
> want. In-reply-to breaks the review ordering for us :/
Oh ok, I didn't know that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists