netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests/net: test nexthop without gw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:36:37 +0200
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests/net: test nexthop without gw


Le 13/07/2022 à 02:25, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:14:17 +0200 Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 11:55:45AM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> This test implement the scenario described in the previous patch.  
>>
>> "previous patch" does not work well when things are committed to the
>> kernel tree.  Please be descriptive.
> 
> And please don't resend your patches in reply to the previous version.
> Add a lore link to the previous version in the commit message if you
> want. In-reply-to breaks the review ordering for us :/
Oh ok, I didn't know that.