[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220715171719.niqcrklpk4ittfvl@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 20:17:19 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?=
<kabel@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: dsa: always use phylink
Hi Russell,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:00:59PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a re-hash of the previous RFC series, this time using the
> suggestion from Vladimir to create a swnode based fixed-link
> specifier.
>
> Most of the changes are to DSA and phylink code from the previous
> series. I've tested on my Clearfog (which has just one Marvell DSA
> switch) and it works there - also tested without the fixed-link
> specified in DT.
I had some comments I wanted to leave on the previous RFC patch set
(which in turn is essentially identical to this one, hence they still
apply), but I held off because I thought you were waiting for some
feedback from Andrew. Has something changed?
I'm going to leave my comments anyway now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists