[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPv3WKcf7U_KLuxg5zgyQZru52QEAgrHq2dO7dD4JGMMCLq05w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 01:15:55 +0200
From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@....com>,
upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH v2 5/8] device property: introduce fwnode_dev_node_match
pt., 15 lip 2022 o 21:42 Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> napisaĆ(a):
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:36:29PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:50:09AM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> > > This patch adds a new generic routine fwnode_dev_node_match
> > > that can be used e.g. as a callback for class_find_device().
> > > It searches for the struct device corresponding to a
> > > struct fwnode_handle by iterating over device and
> > > its parents.
> >
> > Implementation
> > 1) misses the word 'parent';
I'm not sure. We don't necessarily look for parent device(s). We start
with a struct device and if it matches the fwnode, success is returned
immediately. Only otherwise we iterate over parent devices to find a
match.
> > 2) located outside of the group of fwnode APIs operating on parents.
I can shift it right below fwnode_get_nth_parent if you prefer.
> >
> > I would suggest to rename to fwnode_get_next_parent_node() and place
> > near to fwnode_get_next_parent_dev() (either before or after, where
> > it makes more sense).
>
> And matching function will be after that:
>
> return fwnode_get_next_parent_node(...) != NULL;
>
> Think about it. Maybe current solution is good enough, just needs better
> naming (fwnode_match_parent_node()? Dunno).
>
> P.S. Actually _get maybe misleading as we won't bump reference counting,
> rather _find?
>
How about the following name:
fwnode_find_dev_match()
?
Thanks,
Marcin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists