[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtMFljr/I7UtSr+y@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:38:14 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 14/47] net: phy: aquantia: Add support for
rate adaptation
> +#define VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_10M 0x0310
> +#define VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_100M 0x031b
> +#define VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_1G 0x031c
> +#define VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_2_5G 0x031d
> +#define VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_5G 0x031e
> +#define VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_10G 0x031f
I completely read this wrong the first time... The common meaning of
#defines line this is
VEND1_GLOBAL_CFG_ is the register and what follows indicates some bits
in the register.
However, this is not true here, these are all registers. Maybe add
_REG to the end? It makes them different to other defines for
registers, but if i parsed it wrong, probably other will as well?
> static int aqr107_read_rate(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {
> int val;
> + u32 config_reg;
Revere Christmass tree. config_reg should be first.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists