netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: bridge: ensure that link-local traffic cannot unlock a locked port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220717140325.p5ox5mhqedbyyiz4@skbuf>
Date:   Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:03:25 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Hans S <schultz.hans@...il.com>
Cc:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Hans Schultz <schultz.hans+netdev@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: bridge: ensure that link-local
 traffic cannot unlock a locked port

On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 04:46:10PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Here, what happens is that a locked port learns the MAC SA from the
> traffic it didn't drop, i.e. link-local. In other words, the bridge
> behaves as expected and instructed: +locked +learning will cause just
> that. It's the administrator's fault for not disabling learning.
> It's also the mv88e6xxx driver's fault for not validating the "locked" +
> "learning" brport flag *combination* until it properly supports "+locked
> +learning" (the feature you are currently working on).
> 
> I'm still confused why we don't just say that "+locked -learning" means
> plain 802.1X, "+locked +learning" means MAB where we learn locked FDB entries.

Or is it the problem that a "+locked +learning" bridge port will learn
MAC SA from link-local traffic, but it will create FDB entries without
the locked flag while doing so? The mv88e6xxx driver should react to the
'locked' flag from both directions (ADD_TO_DEVICE too, not just ADD_TO_BRIDGE).