[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8acab95-cbff-93c9-e83d-31f6dc7e7e8d@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 12:27:25 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 14/15] docs: net: dsa: delete misinformation about
-EOPNOTSUPP for FDB/MDB/VLAN
On 7/16/2022 11:53 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Returning -EOPNOTSUPP does *NOT* mean anything special.
>
> port_vlan_add() is actually called from 2 code paths, one is
> vlan_vid_add() from 8021q module and the other is
> br_switchdev_port_vlan_add() from switchdev.
>
> The bridge has a wrapper __vlan_vid_add() which first tries via
> switchdev, then if that returns -EOPNOTSUPP, tries again via the VLAN RX
> filters in the 8021q module. But DSA doesn't distinguish between one
> call path and the other when calling the driver's port_vlan_add(), so if
> the driver returns -EOPNOTSUPP to switchdev, it also returns -EOPNOTSUPP
> to the 8021q module. And the latter is a hard error.
>
> port_fdb_add() is called from the deferred dsa_owq only, so obviously
> its return code isn't propagated anywhere, and cannot be interpreted in
> any way.
>
> The return code from port_mdb_add() is propagated to the bridge, but
> again, this doesn't do anything special when -EOPNOTSUPP is returned,
> but rather, br_switchdev_mdb_notify() returns void.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists