[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtUWS8N2p1Ej/PeD@google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:14:03 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>,
"katie.morris@...advantage.com" <katie.morris@...advantage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 0/9] add support for VSC7512 control over SPI
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022, Colin Foster wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 10:08:57PM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 07:10:48PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:21:16AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:51:35 +0100 Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > Can this go into net-next if there are no more complains over the
> > > > > > weekend? Anyone still planning to review?
> > > > >
> > > > > As the subsystem with the fewest changes, I'm not sure why it would.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, just going by the tag in the subject. I have no preference,
> > > > looks like it applies cleanly to Linus'.
> > > >
> > > > > I'd planed to route this in via MFD and send out a pull-request for
> > > > > other sub-system maintainers to pull from.
> > > > >
> > > > > If you would like to co-ordinate it instead, you'd be welcome to.
> > > > > However, I (and probably Linus) would need a succinct immutable branch
> > > > > to pull from.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, that'd be perfect, sorry, I didn't realize there was already a plan.
> > > > If you're willing to carry on as intended, please do.
> > > >
> > > > Colin if there is another version please make a note of the above
> > > > merging plan in the cover letter and drop the net-next tag.
> > > > Just in case my goldfish brain forgets.
> > >
> > > I wasn't sure of the plan, but this makes sense to bring it through MFD.
> > > Fortunately there's enough work for me on the DSA front that there's no
> > > way that'll land before this merge window - so I have no objection to it
> > > going any non-net-next path.
> > >
> > > I'll look to Lee as to whether there should be a v14 with the header
> > > guard addition per Vladimir's review, or whether that should be in a
> > > future patch set. I'm happy to go either way.
> >
> > From my side, the changes to this patch set can be incremental, I'd be
> > happy if Lee would take them as is.
>
> Just making sure this hasn't slipped through the cracks. Should I resend
> this next week (Monday / Tuesday?) with the Reviewed-by tags and switch
> it to MFD instead of net-next?
Not yet please.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists