netdev - Re: [net-next RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: qca8k: drop qca8k

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220718234358.27zv5ogeuvgmaud4@skbuf>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 02:43:58 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC PATCH 1/4] net: dsa: qca8k: drop
 qca8k_read/write/rmw for regmap variant

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:54:44PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 11:30:42PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 09:30:58PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > Tell me if I got this wrong.
> > > 
> > > The suggestion was to move the struct dsa_switch_ops to qca8k.h and add
> > > in the specific code probe the needed ops to add to the generic
> > > struct...
> > 
> > The declaration yes; the definition to qca8k-common.c. See for example
> > where felix_switch_ops is, relative to felix_vsc9959.c, seville_vsc9953.c
> > (users), felix.h (declaration), and felix.c (definition). Or how
> > mv88e6xxx_switch_ops does things and still supports a gazillion of switches.
> 
> Mhh I checked the example and they doesn't seems to be useful from my
> problem. But I think it's better to discuss this to the patch directly
> so you can better understand whay I intended with having dsa_switch_ops
> set to const.

So you don't modify the common dsa_switch_ops from the switch-specific
probe path, but rather, from the common dsa_switch_ops method, you call
a second function pointer.

static void felix_phylink_validate(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
				   unsigned long *supported,
				   struct phylink_link_state *state)
{
	struct ocelot *ocelot = ds->priv;
	struct felix *felix = ocelot_to_felix(ocelot);

	if (felix->info->phylink_validate)
		felix->info->phylink_validate(ocelot, port, supported, state);
}