netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/13] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier failed test in unprivileged mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:24:30 +0200
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/13] selftests/bpf: Fix test_verifier failed test in unprivileged mode

Loading the BTF won't be permitted without privileges, hence only test
for privileged mode by setting the prog type. This makes the
test_verifier show 0 failures when unprivileged BPF is enabled.

Fixes: 4118e9e9def ("selftest/bpf: Test for use-after-free bug fix in inline_bpf_loop")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
index 2d0023659d88..a535d41dc20d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c
@@ -251,6 +251,7 @@
 	.expected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() },
 	.unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
 	.func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 16, CALLBACK_TYPE } },
 	.func_info_cnt = 2,
 	BTF_TYPES
-- 
2.34.1