netdev - Re: [RFC 1/1] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn-dco)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:25:57 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn-dco)

> +static void ovpn_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev,
> +			     struct ethtool_drvinfo *info)
> +{
> +	strscpy(info->driver, DRV_NAME, sizeof(info->driver));
> +	strscpy(info->version, DRV_VERSION, sizeof(info->version));
> +	strscpy(info->bus_info, "ovpn", sizeof(info->bus_info));

version is generally considered useless information if it comes from
the driver. You have no idea if this is version 42 in net-next, or
some backported version in an enterprise kernel with lots of out of
tree patches. The driver is not standalone, it runs inside the
kernel. So in order to understand a bug report, you need to know what
kernel it is. If you don't fill in version, the core will with the
kernel version, which is much more useful.

       Andrew