[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YtbPtkF1Ah9xrBam@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:37:26 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn-dco)
> +static int ovpn_net_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
> +{
> + if (new_mtu < IPV4_MIN_MTU ||
> + new_mtu + dev->hard_header_len > IP_MAX_MTU)
> + return -EINVAL;
If you set dev->min_mtu and dev->max_mtu, the core will validate this
for you, see dev_validate_mtu().
> +static int ovpn_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
> +{
> + ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode(cmd->link_modes.supported, 0);
> + ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode(cmd->link_modes.advertising, 0);
These two should not be needed. Look at tun, veth etc, they don't set
them.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists