[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220719231129.1870776-5-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:11:26 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, maximmi@...dia.com,
tariqt@...dia.com, vfedorenko@...ek.ru,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] tls: rx: device: keep the zero copy status with offload
The non-zero-copy path assumes a full skb with decrypted contents.
This means the device offload would have to CoW the data. Try
to keep the zero-copy status instead, copy the data to user space.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: borisp@...dia.com
CC: john.fastabend@...il.com
---
net/tls/tls.h | 1 +
net/tls/tls_strp.c | 9 +++++++++
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls.h b/net/tls/tls.h
index 24bec1c5f1e8..78c5d699bf75 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls.h
+++ b/net/tls/tls.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int tls_sw_fallback_init(struct sock *sk,
struct tls_offload_context_tx *offload_ctx,
struct tls_crypto_info *crypto_info);
+struct sk_buff *tls_strp_msg_detach(struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx);
int tls_strp_msg_hold(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct sk_buff_head *dst);
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_strp.c b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
index 9ccab79a6e1e..40b177366121 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_strp.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_strp.c
@@ -4,6 +4,15 @@
#include "tls.h"
+struct sk_buff *tls_strp_msg_detach(struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+ skb = ctx->recv_pkt;
+ ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
+ return skb;
+}
+
int tls_strp_msg_hold(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct sk_buff_head *dst)
{
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 7345b41ded9d..02894a2d1f31 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -1631,8 +1631,8 @@ tls_decrypt_sw(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *tls_ctx,
}
static int
-tls_decrypt_device(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *tls_ctx,
- struct tls_decrypt_arg *darg)
+tls_decrypt_device(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
+ struct tls_context *tls_ctx, struct tls_decrypt_arg *darg)
{
struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
struct tls_prot_info *prot = &tls_ctx->prot_info;
@@ -1650,13 +1650,33 @@ tls_decrypt_device(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *tls_ctx,
if (pad < 0)
return pad;
- darg->zc = false;
darg->async = false;
darg->skb = tls_strp_msg(ctx);
- ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
+ /* ->zc downgrade check, in case TLS 1.3 gets here */
+ darg->zc &= !(prot->version == TLS_1_3_VERSION &&
+ tls_msg(darg->skb)->control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA);
rxm = strp_msg(darg->skb);
rxm->full_len -= pad;
+
+ if (!darg->zc) {
+ /* Non-ZC case needs a real skb */
+ darg->skb = tls_strp_msg_detach(ctx);
+ if (!darg->skb)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ } else {
+ unsigned int off, len;
+
+ /* In ZC case nobody cares about the output skb.
+ * Just copy the data here. Note the skb is not fully trimmed.
+ */
+ off = rxm->offset + prot->prepend_size;
+ len = rxm->full_len - prot->overhead_size;
+
+ err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(darg->skb, off, msg, len);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
return 1;
}
@@ -1668,7 +1688,7 @@ static int tls_rx_one_record(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
struct strp_msg *rxm;
int err;
- err = tls_decrypt_device(sk, tls_ctx, darg);
+ err = tls_decrypt_device(sk, msg, tls_ctx, darg);
if (!err)
err = tls_decrypt_sw(sk, tls_ctx, msg, darg);
if (err < 0)
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists