netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 10/12] mlxsw: core_linecards: Implement line card device flashing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ytfeu1QFOyP5s+UF@nanopsycho>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 12:53:47 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        petrm@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        mlxsw@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com, snelson@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 10/12] mlxsw: core_linecards: Implement line
 card device flashing

Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:46:25PM CEST, idosch@...dia.com wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:48:45AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>> 
>> Implement flash_update() devlink op for the line card devlink instance
>> to allow user to update line card gearbox FW using MDDT register
>> and mlxfw.
>> 
>> Example:
>> $ devlink dev flash auxiliary/mlxsw_core.lc.0 file mellanox/fw-AGB-rel-19_2010_1312-022-EVB.mfa2
>
>Need to mention that this is only possible when line card is
>active/ready

I don't see the need. This is an example. When user issues it and device
is not ready, he gets back an error. As with any other example.


>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>
>[...]
>
>> +int mlxsw_linecard_flash_update(struct devlink *linecard_devlink,
>> +				struct mlxsw_linecard *linecard,
>> +				const struct firmware *firmware,
>> +				struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +	struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = linecard->linecards->mlxsw_core;
>> +	struct mlxsw_linecard_device_fw_info info = {
>> +		.mlxfw_dev = {
>> +			.ops = &mlxsw_linecard_device_dev_ops,
>> +			.psid = linecard->device.info.psid,
>> +			.psid_size = strlen(linecard->device.info.psid),
>> +			.devlink = linecard_devlink,
>> +		},
>> +		.mlxsw_core = mlxsw_core,
>> +		.linecard = linecard,
>> +	};
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&linecard->lock);
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!linecard->ready)) {
>
>Can't this be easily triggered from user space when executing the above
>command for a provisioned line card? If so, please remove the WARN_ON()
>and add an extack

Yep, you are correct, this is leftover I missed to fix. Will do.


>
>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +	}
>> +	err = mlxsw_core_fw_flash(mlxsw_core, &info.mlxfw_dev,
>> +				  firmware, extack);
>> +unlock:
>> +	mutex_unlock(&linecard->lock);
>> +	return err;
>> +}