lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <823ae0f4-b7c5-a301-0f2d-66f0e0a36aba@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 13:45:27 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> To: "Katakam, Harini" <harini.katakam@....com>, Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@...inx.com>, "nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com" <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org> Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>, "harinikatakamlinux@...il.com" <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com" <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cdns,macb: Add versal compatible string On 20/07/2022 13:36, Katakam, Harini wrote: >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml >>> index 9c92156869b2..1e9f49bb8249 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml >>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties: >>> - enum: >>> - cdns,zynq-gem # Xilinx Zynq-7xxx SoC >>> - cdns,zynqmp-gem # Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+ MPSoC >>> + - cdns,versal-gem # Xilinx Versal >> >> Not really ordered by name. Why adding to the end? > > Thanks for the review. It is just based on the order in which device > families from Xilinx were released. I can alphabetize if that's preferred. Yes, it's the easiest way to avoid conflicts. Best regards, Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists