lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ytf4ZaJdJY20ULfw@shredder>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 15:43:17 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        petrm@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        mlxsw@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com, snelson@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 05/12] mlxsw: core_linecards: Expose HW
 revision and INI version

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:56:35AM CEST, idosch@...dia.com wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:48:40AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> +int mlxsw_linecard_devlink_info_get(struct mlxsw_linecard *linecard,
> >> +				    struct devlink_info_req *req,
> >> +				    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >> +{
> >> +	char buf[32];
> >> +	int err;
> >> +
> >> +	mutex_lock(&linecard->lock);
> >> +	if (WARN_ON(!linecard->provisioned)) {
> >> +		err = 0;
> >
> >Why not:
> >
> >err = -EINVAL;
> >
> >?
> 
> Well, a) this should not happen. No need to push error to the user for
> this as the rest of the info message is still fine.

Not sure what you mean by "the rest of the info message is still fine".
Which info message? If the line card is not provisioned, then it
shouldn't even have a devlink instance and it will not appear in
"devlink dev info" dump.

I still do not understand why this error is severe enough to print a
WARNING to the kernel log, but not emit an error code to user space.

> 
> 
> >
> >> +		goto unlock;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	sprintf(buf, "%d", linecard->hw_revision);
> >> +	err = devlink_info_version_fixed_put(req, "hw.revision", buf);
> >> +	if (err)
> >> +		goto unlock;
> >> +
> >> +	sprintf(buf, "%d", linecard->ini_version);
> >> +	err = devlink_info_version_running_put(req, "ini.version", buf);
> >> +	if (err)
> >> +		goto unlock;
> >> +
> >> +unlock:
> >> +	mutex_unlock(&linecard->lock);
> >> +	return err;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static int
> >>  mlxsw_linecard_provision_set(struct mlxsw_linecard *linecard, u8 card_type,
> >>  			     u16 hw_revision, u16 ini_version)
> >> -- 
> >> 2.35.3
> >> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ