netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 05/12] mlxsw: core_linecards: Expose HW revision and INI version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YtgYEN2jXIZftqSH@nanopsycho>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:58:24 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        petrm@...dia.com, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        mlxsw@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com, snelson@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 05/12] mlxsw: core_linecards: Expose HW
 revision and INI version

Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 02:50:09PM CEST, idosch@...dia.com wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 03:43:17PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 02:27:40PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:56:35AM CEST, idosch@...dia.com wrote:
>> > >On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:48:40AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > >> +int mlxsw_linecard_devlink_info_get(struct mlxsw_linecard *linecard,
>> > >> +				    struct devlink_info_req *req,
>> > >> +				    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> > >> +{
>> > >> +	char buf[32];
>> > >> +	int err;
>> > >> +
>> > >> +	mutex_lock(&linecard->lock);
>> > >> +	if (WARN_ON(!linecard->provisioned)) {
>> > >> +		err = 0;
>> > >
>> > >Why not:
>> > >
>> > >err = -EINVAL;
>> > >
>> > >?
>> > 
>> > Well, a) this should not happen. No need to push error to the user for
>> > this as the rest of the info message is still fine.
>> 
>> Not sure what you mean by "the rest of the info message is still fine".
>> Which info message? If the line card is not provisioned, then it
>> shouldn't even have a devlink instance and it will not appear in
>> "devlink dev info" dump.
>
>How about returning '-EOPNOTSUPP'? Looks like devlink will skip it in a
>dump

Okay.