lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220721145716.745433-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 16:57:16 +0200
From:   Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
To:     "shenjian (K)" <shenjian15@...wei.com>
Cc:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
        ecree.xilinx@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, saeed@...nel.org,
        leon@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...neuler.org,
        lipeng321@...wei.com,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv6 PATCH net-next 02/19] net: replace general features macroes with global netdev_features variables

From: shenjian (K) <shenjian15@...wei.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 09:15:59 +0800

> 在 2022/7/20 23:09, Alexander Lobakin 写道:
> > From: shenjian (K) <shenjian15@...wei.com>
> > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 17:54:13 +0800
> >
> >> 在 2022/4/19 22:49, Alexander Lobakin 写道:
> >> > From: Jian Shen <shenjian15@...wei.com>
> >> > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:21:49 +0800
> >> >
> >> >> There are many netdev_features bits group used in kernel. The 
> >> definition
> >> >> will be illegal when using feature bit more than 64. Replace these 
> >> macroes
> >> >> with global netdev_features variables, initialize them when netdev 
> >> module
> >> >> init.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jian Shen <shenjian15@...wei.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>   drivers/net/wireguard/device.c  |  10 +-
> >> >>   include/linux/netdev_features.h | 102 +++++++++-----
> >> >>   net/core/Makefile               |   2 +-
> >> >>   net/core/dev.c                  |  87 ++++++++++++
> >> >>   net/core/netdev_features.c      | 241 
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >>   5 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> >> >>   create mode 100644 net/core/netdev_features.c
> >> >>
> >> > --- 8< ---
> >> >
> >> >> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> >> >> index 4d6b57752eee..85bb418e8ef1 100644
> >> >> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> >> >> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> >> >> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@
> >> >>   #include <linux/sctp.h>
> >> >>   #include <net/udp_tunnel.h>
> >> >>   #include <linux/net_namespace.h>
> >> >> +#include <linux/netdev_features_helper.h>
> >> >>   #include <linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h>
> >> >>   #include <net/devlink.h>
> >> >>   #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >> >> @@ -11255,6 +11256,90 @@ static struct pernet_operations 
> >> __net_initdata default_device_ops = {
> >> >>       .exit_batch = default_device_exit_batch,
> >> >>   };
> >> >>   >> +static void netdev_features_init(void)
> >> > It is an initialization function, so it must be marked as __init.
> >> right, I will add it, thanks!
> >>
> >> >> +{
> >> >> +    netdev_features_t features;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + netdev_features_set_array(&netif_f_never_change_feature_set,
> >> >> +                  &netdev_never_change_features);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + netdev_features_set_array(&netif_f_gso_feature_set_mask,
> >> > I'm not sure it does make sense to have an empty newline between
> >> > each call. I'd leave newlines only between the "regular" blocks
> >> > and the "multi-call" blocks, I mean, stuff like VLAN, GSO and
> >> > @netdev_ethtool_features.
> >> At first, I added empty newline per call for the it used three lines.
> >> Now the new call just use two lines, I will remove some unnecessary
> >> blank lines.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> > I see no news regarding the conversion since the end of April, maybe
> > I could pick it and finish if nobody objects? I'll preserve the
> > original authorship for sure.
> >
> Hi, Alexander
> 
> Sorry for late to finish the whole patchset with treewide changes, but 
> I'm still working on it.
> And most of the convertsions have been completed. I will send to new 
> patchset in two weeks.

Oh okay, I was only worried that it could be abandoned for some
reason. Great to hear it's almost done, 120+ drivers is not
something quick or exciting :)
I'll start reviewing the series, at least its "core" part, as soon
as it hits netdev ML. Thanks!

> 
> Jian
> 
> >>
> >> >> +                  &netdev_gso_features_mask);

[...]

> > Thanks,
> > Olek
> >
> > .
> >
> 

Olek

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ