netdev - RE: [Patch v4 03/12] net: mana: Handle vport sharing between devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <PH7PR21MB326339501D9CA5ABE69F8AE9CE919@PH7PR21MB3263.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:58:39 +0000
From:   Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC:     Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "shiraz.saleem@...el.com" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
        Ajay Sharma <sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch v4 03/12] net: mana: Handle vport sharing between devices

> Subject: Re: [Patch v4 03/12] net: mana: Handle vport sharing between
> devices
> 
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:06:12AM +0000, Long Li wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [Patch v4 03/12] net: mana: Handle vport sharing
> > > between devices
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 06:48:09PM +0000, Long Li wrote:
> > > > > > @@ -563,9 +581,19 @@ static int mana_cfg_vport(struct
> > > > > > mana_port_context *apc, u32 protection_dom_id,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	apc->tx_shortform_allowed = resp.short_form_allowed;
> > > > > >  	apc->tx_vp_offset = resp.tx_vport_offset;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +	netdev_info(apc->ndev, "Configured vPort %llu PD %u
> DB %u\n",
> > > > > > +		    apc->port_handle, protection_dom_id,
> doorbell_pg_id);
> > > > > Should this be netdev_dbg()?
> > > > > The log buffer can be flooded if there are many vPorts per VF
> > > > > PCI device and there are a lot of VFs.
> > > >
> > > > The reason netdev_info () is used is that this message is
> > > > important for troubleshooting initial setup issues with Ethernet
> > > > driver. We rely on user to get this configured right to share the
> > > > same hardware port between Ethernet and RDMA driver. As far as I
> > > > know, there is no easy way for a driver to "take over" an
> > > > exclusive hardware resource from another driver.
> > >
> > > This seems like a really strange statement.
> > >
> > > Exactly how does all of this work?
> > >
> > > Jason
> >
> > "vport" is a hardware resource that can either be used by an Ethernet
> > device, or an RDMA device. But it can't be used by both at the same
> > time. The "vport" is associated with a protection domain and doorbell,
> > it's programmed in the hardware. Outgoing traffic is enforced on this
> > vport based on how it is programmed.
> 
> Sure, but how is the users problem to "get this configured right" and what
> exactly is the user supposed to do?
> 
> I would expect the allocation of HW resources to be completely transparent
> to the user. Why is it not?
> 
> Jason

In the hardware, RDMA RAW_QP shares the same hardware resource (in this case, the vPort in hardware table) with the ethernet NIC. When an RDMA user creates a RAW_QP, we can't just shut down the ethernet. The user is required to make sure the ethernet is not in used when he creates this QP type.