[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA2PR11MB51008B53EE77ADF3ADA5D8E1D6919@SA2PR11MB5100.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:57:44 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [net-next PATCH 1/2] devlink: add dry run attribute to flash
update
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2022 9:48 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] devlink: add dry run attribute to flash update
>
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 11:34:32 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> > + nla_dry_run = info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_DRY_RUN];
> > + if (nla_dry_run) {
> > + if (!(supported_params &
> DEVLINK_SUPPORT_FLASH_UPDATE_DRY_RUN)) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, nla_dry_run,
> > + "flash update is supported, but dry run
> is not supported for this device");
> > + release_firmware(params.fw);
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
> > + params.dry_run = true;
> > + }
>
> Looks over-indented. You can do this, right?
>
> params.dry_run = nla_get_flag(info->attrs[DEVLINK_ATTR_DRY_RUN]);
> if (params.dry_run &&
> !(supported_params &
> DEVLINK_SUPPORT_FLASH_UPDATE_DRY_RUN)) {
> /* error handling */
> }
Yea that makes more sense.
Thanks,
Jake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists