netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/24] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Jul 2022 23:05:59 +0200
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/24] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an
 allocated mem

On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 at 17:38, Benjamin Tissoires
<benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> For drivers (outside of network), the incoming data is not statically
> defined in a struct. Most of the time the data buffer is kzalloc-ed
> and thus we can not rely on eBPF and BTF to explore the data.
>
> This commit allows to return an arbitrary memory, previously allocated by
> the driver.
> An interesting extra point is that the kfunc can mark the exported
> memory region as read only or read/write.
>
> So, when a kfunc is not returning a pointer to a struct but to a plain
> type, we can consider it is a valid allocated memory assuming that:
> - one of the arguments is either called rdonly_buf_size or
>   rdwr_buf_size
> - and this argument is a const from the caller point of view
>
> We can then use this parameter as the size of the allocated memory.
>
> The memory is either read-only or read-write based on the name
> of the size parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
>
> ---

Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>